By: Paul Johnson
Published on July 29th, 2010 @ 06:30:24 pm , using 1434 words Posted in Scottsdale Examiner
I have to admit that I love political conversations at work. Granted, in my position I have to be a bit careful, but none the less they are fun.
One of the other directors asked me this morning, "So what do you think about the strong ruling against Arizona yesterday?"
My retort. "What do you think about the strong ruling against the Obama Administration yesterday?" The look of confusion was absolutely classic! Profound "dumbfoundedness," polarized by contempt and confusion.
"What ruling against Obama? I am talking about SB 1070. There was no ruling against Obama." As she began to insist upon herslf.
And therein lies the problem ladies and gentlemen. Reliance on mass media that actually has gotten the story completely wrong. The initial story went out without all of the details of the ruling. In the haste for writers go be read, that story is elaborated on just enough to avoid plagiarism and slightly altered versions of the same incorrect and shallow story reverberated across the nation - all incorrect. (Read more).
Featured on Conservative Refocus.
Published on July 29th, 2010 @ 06:30:24 pm , using 1434 words Posted in Scottsdale Examiner
I have to admit that I love political conversations at work. Granted, in my position I have to be a bit careful, but none the less they are fun.
One of the other directors asked me this morning, "So what do you think about the strong ruling against Arizona yesterday?"
My retort. "What do you think about the strong ruling against the Obama Administration yesterday?" The look of confusion was absolutely classic! Profound "dumbfoundedness," polarized by contempt and confusion.
"What ruling against Obama? I am talking about SB 1070. There was no ruling against Obama." As she began to insist upon herslf.
And therein lies the problem ladies and gentlemen. Reliance on mass media that actually has gotten the story completely wrong. The initial story went out without all of the details of the ruling. In the haste for writers go be read, that story is elaborated on just enough to avoid plagiarism and slightly altered versions of the same incorrect and shallow story reverberated across the nation - all incorrect. (Read more).
Featured on Conservative Refocus.
RSS Feed